Multi-Agency Collaboration and Information Sharing

No single agency can fully understand or respond to the complexities of CCE in isolation. Effective risk assessment depends on robust collaboration and timely information sharing across all agencies. Local safeguarding partnerships should have clear protocols in place to facilitate joint assessments and decision-making.

This flowchart, embedded in the UNOCINI Framework, provides a structured decision-making guide for practitioners who are considering sharing information in the context of safeguarding concerns. It outlines a step-by-step process to help determine whether information can be lawfully and appropriately shared, balancing the need for confidentiality with the imperative to protect individuals from harm. By following the flowchart, practitioners can ensure that their actions are informed by legal, ethical, and organisational standards, and that any information shared is justified, proportionate, and in the best interest of the child or young person concerned.

Annex B outlines key tools and strategies to disrupt the activity of suspected perpetrators of child exploitation. These strategies are essential for safeguarding victims and preventing re-offending. While PSNI lead enforcement, other services play a vital role and should understand the legal powers available to support disruption efforts.

Disruption can be both proactive (e.g. applying for orders) and reactive (e.g. pursuing offences). Strategic use of prosecution powers plays a central role in disrupting exploitation networks and sends a clear message that such abuse will not be tolerated. Equally important is the role of practitioners in ensuring that children and young people coerced into criminal activity are diverted from prosecution where appropriate.

Timely, coordinated action is key. Practitioners should record and share any orders or actions taken, and check for existing measures to ensure a joined-up approach to disrupting perpetrator activity.